Investigate
Connect alarms, maintenance records and contracts to understand what happened.
PKC Energy / Built for energy teams
AI agents forenergy operations.
Less time piecing information together.
AI agents that work across your systems, records and teams.
Software for the work behind the infrastructure.Solar / Wind / Battery storage
01 / What we’re building
The asset is connected.
The work should be too.
Report
Bring recurring exports and document checks into one reporting workflow.
Coordinate
Prepare the context and follow-ups the next person needs to move work forward.
02 / A closer look
From a discrepancy
to a documented case.
Follow an event through operational records, contracts and a review-ready finding. Select a tab to explore. Illustrative data.
Ask PKC / Havel Battery ParkINC-10482 Open
Expected payment€49,240
Statement received€48,000
Difference to review€1,240 ↗
Havel Battery Park · 14 March Illustrative revenue profile
4 hours offline04:00–08:00
00:0004:0008:0012:0016:0020:0024:00
Havel Battery ParkBrandenburg, Germany · 20 MW / 40 MWh
Needs investigationPKC Agent found a payment difference. Opening the linked event…
Asset structure
Container B
Inverter 01
Inverter 02!
Battery rack 01
Battery rack 02
Battery rack 03
Battery rack 04
Telemetry & event
VoltageTemperaturePowerSoC
14 MAR 2026 · 04:00
Inverter protection trip
Inverter 02 stopped delivering power. Output resumed at 08:00.
Unavailable4 hours
Potential contract credit€1,240Subject to clause & eligibility review
✓ SCADA export✓ Alarm log
↓ Evidence pack 3 sources
Event window confirmed. Checking the relevant contract clause…
CTR-2087 · AVAILABILITY AGREEMENT
4.2 Availability credit
For each eligible hour of interruption,
a credit of €310 per hour applies.
a credit of €310 per hour applies.
§ 4.2 ↔ EVT-48216 · 4 eligible hours
REPRODUCIBLE CALCULATION
4hours×€310per hour
Credit to check€1,240
Base payment€48,000
Expected incl. credit€49,240
Statement received€48,000
Eligibility and contract interpretation pending review.€1,240 remains unexplained. Assembling the evidence for review…
CASE INC-10482 · BESS-DE-017
Availability credit
€1,240Pending human review⌁
Event EVT-4821614 Mar · 04:00–08:00 · 4 hours
✓▤
Contract § 4.2Contract rate · €310 / hour
✓≡
Calculation receipt4 × €310 = €1,240
✓Provider enquiryDRAFT
Could you clarify this adjustment?
Our review identified a four-hour interruption on 14 March. The availability clause indicates a €1,240 credit.
Could you confirm how this was reflected in the March statement?
Request more evidenceReview draft ↗
Nothing sent. Your team approves the next step.Your team confirms the interpretation, then chooses the next action.
I remember an outage at Havel last month. Find it, check the maintenance records and contract, and tell me what’s missing.
Cross-checking✓ Event logs✓ Maintenance✓ Grid notices✓ Contract
PKC Energy4 connected systems
Two interruptions found. March 22 looks like the grid outage.
March 14 was an inverter trip. On March 22, a grid notice and site-wide telemetry overlap. Here’s the combined timeline.
22 MAR · RECONSTRUCTED TIMELINE
Site export drops to zeroSCADA · EVT-48593
Grid interruption notice issuedGrid notice · GN-7318
Export resumes · 53 minutes laterTelemetry confirms restoration
3 cross-system findings
CROSS-SYSTEM FINDINGS
01Maintenance record conflictsWO-63841 says “inverter reset”; grid notice points to an external interruption.
02Contract treatment depends on causeCTR-2087 · § 6.1 excludes qualifying grid outages.
03Missing: confirmed causeRequest the operator’s closure report before classifying the event.
Compare both interruptions ↗Draft operator enquiry ↗
03 / Our approach
Start with
one workflow.
Understand the work
Map the records, systems and handoffs involved in a recurring task.
Define a focused pilot
Agree on the inputs, outputs, access and review points with your team.
Evaluate it together
Check the output against your process and agreed success criteria before expanding the scope.
FAQ
A few essentials.
What we do and how to get in touch.
What is PKC Energy building?
AI agents for repetitive work across energy teams’ existing systems, from checking records to preparing reports and handovers. Our focus is solar, wind and battery storage.
How do you approach data security?
Before any pilot, we agree on what data is needed, who can access it and how it will be stored and retained. You don’t need to share internal data or grant system access for an initial conversation.
How can we get in touch?
Email contact@pkcenergy.com. We’d like to learn about your team’s day-to-day work and where repetitive tasks take up time.
Get in touch
What keeps your team
doing the same work twice?
We’re developing PKC for energy teams and looking for early partners. Tell us about a process you would like to improve.